573 So. 2d 998 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 14 later decisions

states following

October 2014

most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2014

14 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith · 371 So. 2d 1024 - McCreary v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“(4)(b) The intent of the Legislature is to convict and sentence for each criminal offense committed in the course of one criminal episode or transaction and not to allow the principle of lenity as set forth in subsection (1) to determine legislative intent. Exceptions to this rule of construction are: 3. Offenses which are lesser offenses the statutory elements of which are subsumed by the greater offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 599 So. 2d 1365 - Perrin v. State · 630 So. 2d 1143 - Salgat v. State
“(1)(a) The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury of any person must immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident, or as close thereto as possible, and must remain at the scene of the accident until he or she has fulfilled the requirements of s. 316.062. Any person who willfully violates this paragraph is guilty of a felony of the third degree, ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 769 So. 2d 1109 - Hunt v. State · 744 So. 2d 1193 - Pierce v. State
“[a] double jeopardy claim may be waived and the failure to raise such an issue in the trial court, with regard to multiple convictions, precludes consideration of the issue on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Brown v. State · Austin v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.