Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA’s Empirical Analysis
573 U.S. 302 · 2014
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 7410 · 42 U.S.C. § 7602 · 42 U.S.C. § 7607
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Morton v. Ruiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 170 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“core administrative-law principle that an agency may not rewrite clear statutory terms to suit its own sense of how the statute should operate.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Even under Chevron 's deferential framework, agencies must operate within the bounds of reasonable interpretation. ... A statutory provision that may seem ambiguous in isolation is often clarified by the remainder of the statutory scheme because only one of the permissible meanings produces a substantive effect that is compatible with the rest of the law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The power of executing the laws ... does not include a power to revise clear statutory terms that turn out not to work in practice,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.