State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Nordstrom · State v. Crowhurst · State v. Creighton · In Re Daniel · State v. Wiley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Hearsay exceptions; availability of de-clarant immaterial. — The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: [[Image here]] (2) Excited Utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Krakue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.