Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 A2D 843 - Cummings v. Pinder

Cummings v. Pinder’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

4 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2012

4 district · 10 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregory v. United States · Levitt v. Bouvier · 57 Md. App. 190 - Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co. · Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Greenbelt Homes, Inc. · Jardel Co., Inc. v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he intentional infliction of severe emotional distress may provide the legal predicate for an award of damages, even in the absence of accompanying bodily harm, if such conduct is viewed as outrageous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.