United States v. Barger’s Empirical Analysis
574 F.2d 1283 · 1978
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 960 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · Dothard v. Rawlinson · United States v. Himmelwright · United States v. Afanador
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . what constitutes ‘reasonable suspicion’ to justify a particular search may not suffice to justify a more intrusive or demeaning search.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. M. M. v. Anker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.