United States v. Boyer’s Empirical Analysis
574 F.2d 951 · 1978
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Williams (1979), Warren v. City of Lincoln (1989)
19 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3109
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Jones v. United States · Ker v. State of California · Alderman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At the request of a party the judge shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of the other witnesses, and he may make the order of his own motion. This rule does not authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or (3) a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of his cause. [Emphasis supplied.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chavez“To make an arrest in criminal actions, the officer may break open any outer or inner door or window of a dwelling house or other building, or any other enclosure, if, after notice of his office and purpose, he be refused admittance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.