Dasher v. Attorney General’s Empirical Analysis
574 F.3d 1310 · 2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Yarborough v. Alvarado · Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al. v. Dotson et al. · Wright v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections W
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our discretion to formulate such a remedy, without disturbing the judgment of conviction, derives from 28 U.S.C. § 2243 , which authorizes federal habeas courts to 'dispose of the matter as law and justice requires.’ ”); see also Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 , 779, 128 S.Ct. 2229 , 2266, 171 L.Ed.2d 41 (2008) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.