Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 F.3d 51 - Hallingby v. Hallingby

Hallingby v. Hallingby’s Empirical Analysis

574 F.3d 51 · 2009

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1003 (§ 4 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1056 (§ 206 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1341 (§ 4041 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · Briarpatch Limited Lp v. Phoenix Pictures Inc · Beck v. Pace International Union · 541 F. Supp. 2d 591 - Hallingby Ex Rel. Estate of Hallingby v. Hallingby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[C]itizens of different States' means that there must be complete diversity, i.e., that each plaintiff's citizenship must be different from the citizenship of each defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “honor any valid court order relating to the provision of child support, alimony payments, or marital property rights to a Spouse, former Spouse, child or other dependant of an Annuitant covered under this Contract if such order does not require payments under a form of benefit not otherwise available under this Contract nor increase the present value of the benefit payable under the Contract ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “acknowledge that they have no right, title or interest in any of the bank accounts, securities, pension plans, retirement plans, profit sharing plans, annuities or IRAs now in the name of the other, whether in the other’s sole name or jointly or in trust for another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.