¶1 Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3 Stephen Mark Hause seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction filed in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) proceeding. To the extent that Hause seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of a temporary restraining order, the denial is not appeal-able on the circumstances of this case. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir.1976). To the extent that he also sought a preliminary injunction, we have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court’s denial of any such request was not an abuse of its discretion. See Dewhurst v. Century Aluminum Co., 649 F.3d 287, 290 (4th Cir.2011). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as to the request for a temporary restraining order and otherwise affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Hause’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *242 this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4 DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.