Rafael Joseph v.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Wynder v. McMahon · In re Kensington International Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the District Court, if it intended to enter anything other than a final order, can provide such clarification as may be appropriate” in considering Joseph’s Rule 4(a)(5) motion, id. at 62 . The District Court did not specify that it considered its orders non-final and, to the contrary, its grant of Joseph's Rule 4(a)(5) motion suggests that it views the matter as concluded. The District Court also did not grant Joseph leave to further amend and has marked the action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.