Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 FSUPP 197 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
May 1989
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 3

Relies on United States v. Grimaud · Baldwin v. New York · District of Columbia v. Clawans · District of Columbia v. Colts · Moore v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “decision could have a chilling effect on a variety of future protest activities by the defendants and others. This is a serious collateral effect, which may distinguish the crime charged ... from the petty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a jury trial when the maximum sentence would be six months or less if other special circumstances are present such that the crime would not be considered petty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “special circumstance in [that] case because of its First Amendment implications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.