Michael v. NAP Consumer Electronics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2010
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Hines v. Davidowitz · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · Perez. v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.