Lin v. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Kramer v. Time Warner Inc. · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · Rombach v. Chang
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claims under Sections 11 and 12 are usually evaluated in tandem because if a plaintiff fails to plead a cognizable Section 11 claim, he or she will be unable to plead one under Section 12(a).” Lin v. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc., 574 F.Supp.2d 408, 416 (S.D.N.Y.2008) (McMahon, J.). Plaintiff's claims under Section 15(a) against the individual defendants for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.