State v. Eickelberg’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2016
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · New York v. Belton · Bailey v. United States · State v. Robinson · State v. Finnel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person in the immediate possession or control of a firearm while participating in a violation of this subsection [drug violation] shall be sentenced to two times the term otherwise imposed by law”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Wjhile immediate possession, as found in section 124.401(l)(e), may require the firearm to be located on the defendant’s person, immediate control necessitates only that the firearm be in such close proximity to the defendant as to enable him to claim immediate dominion over the firearm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown“support the finding that defendants were in immediate possession or control of the firearms”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.