State v. Sallis’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2017
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rhode Island v. Innis · Pennsylvania v. Muniz · United States v. Mclaughlin · United States v. Horton · State v. Fuhrmann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the government agent should reasonably be aware that the information sought ... is directly relevant to the substantive offense charged”). 28 . See Williams v. Jaglowski, 269 F.3d 778, 785 (7th Cir.2001) (holding that it was highly unlikely that the defendant would have incriminated himself in any way by giving his date of birth and citing another case that noted that Miranda warnings- are not generally required before asking arrestees for”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cruz, Adelfo Ramirez“grant the district court wide latitude regarding admissibility [of prejudicial evidence] and will disturb the court's ruling only upon finding an abuse of discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pfau v. Ault
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.