Osborne v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall Partners · 149 Ill. 2d 314 - Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboise · Sutton v. Jondahl · Lexington Insurance v. All Regions Chemical Labs, Inc. · Safeco Insurance v. Capri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ujnder certain circumstances, a landlord and tenant may expressly or implicitly agree to allocate the responsibility for maintaining insurance coverage,” id. at 68 , contrary to RAM's suggestion, Osborne does not constitute rejection of the Bruggeman rule for several reasons. First, we specifically stated in Osborne that we”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as to whether tenants reasonably rely upon landlords to insure the leased structure against damage by fire, as suggested in ... Bruggeman.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.