Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 P2D 713 - Baird v. State

Baird v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Jenkins v. Swan (1983), Miller v. Weaver (2003)

47 state decisions

160197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 17 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 29 U.S.C. § 667 (§ 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970)

Relies on United States v. Biswell · United States v. Richardson · Wyman v. James · State v. Hines · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To grant standing to a litigant, who cannot distinguish himself from all citizens, would be a significant inroad on the representative form of government, and cast the courts in the role of supervising the coordinate branches of government. It would convert the judiciary into an open forum for the resolution of political and ideological disputes about the performance of government.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “ascertains] that there is no jurisdiction in the court because of the absence of a justiciable controversy, then the court can go no further, and its immediate duty is to dismiss the action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'Judicial adherence to the doctrine of separation of powers preserves the courts for the decision of issues between litigants capable of effective determination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.