Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 SO2D 1010 - Gray v. State

Gray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Day v. State · 378 So. 2d 1173 - Turner v. State · 507 So. 2d 580 - Anderson v. State · 516 So. 2d 876 - Hill v. State · 500 So. 2d 1296 - Cox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"As the trial judge stated in his oral charge, § 13A-6-3 (a)(2) [defining heat of passion manslaughter], is designed to cover those situations where the jury does not believe a defendant is guilty of murder but also does not believe the killing was totally justified by self-defense."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Reeves v. State , 186 Ala. 14 , 65 So. 160 , 161 .' Easley v. State , 246 Ala. 359 , at 362, 20 So.2d 519 , 522 (Ala. 1944). Thus, the mere appearance of imminent assault may be sufficient to arouse heat of passion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Cox , at 1298 . (Emphasis added.) In Cox we concluded that "[t]he jury could have reasonably found that the appellant believed that he was about to be assaulted , and, therefore acted out of the heat of passion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.