Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 So. 2d 1066 - Kight v. Dugger

574 So. 2d 1066 - Kight v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Sochor v. State (2004), 656 So. 2d 1253 - Harvey v. Dugger (1995)

27 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockett v. Ohio · Mullaney v. Wilbur · West v. Atkins · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here was sufficient competent evidence adduced at the rule 3.850 hearing to support the trial court's denial of this claim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[F]iles in the possession of CCR in furtherance of its representation of an indigent client are not subject to public disclosure under chapter 119. To hold otherwise would subject the records of a defendant who is unable to retain private collateral representation to public disclosure while those of a defendant represented by private counsel would be immune from such disclosure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`were no undisclosed concessions made to the jailhouse informants by the State Attorney's Office or anyone else.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.