574 So. 2d 1107 - Rowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “While appellant's attorney was served with the notice that the state sought to habitualize appellant as is required by section 775.084(3)(b), that notice and the service thereon do not indicate that appellant was personally served with such notice. Our independent examination of the record below, however, reveals that appellant received actual notice of the state's efforts to habitualize him, appeared at the hearing for that purpose with his attorney, and actively contested the state's efforts. We conclude the notice to appellant was sufficient to support his being habitualized.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 589 So. 2d 336 - Massey v. State

2. “The force that was used to take the victim's purse and was necessary to constitute the offense of robbery was the same force used to support the battery conviction.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 596 So. 2d 1099 - Foster v. State