574 So. 2d 497 - Cain v. Parent’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 91 So. 2d 123 - Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Company · Bearden v. Rucker · 357 So. 2d 1368 - Hernandez v. Comco Ins. Co. · 399 So. 2d 273 - Mathis v. Employers' Fire Ins. Co. · Hernandez v. Comco Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“3. “Insured person” — means you and, if a resident of your household: a) any relative; and b) any dependent person in your care.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.