Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 SO2D 573 - Lambert v. State

Lambert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2011

24 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 475 So. 2d 1136 - Johnson v. State · Williams v. State · Jackson v. State · 473 So. 2d 452 - Winters v. State · 531 So. 2d 632 - Moawad v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our law is clear that an appellant must present to us a record sufficient to show the occurrence of the error he asserts and also that the matter was properly presented to the trial court and timely preserved.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the circumstances, we perceive no grounds for charging [the appellant] and his attorney with responsibility for the fact that the court reporter did not take down what transpired.... On the other hand, we do not think it appropriate that we invent matters not fairly within the record. We approach the critical portion of the trial with a common sense awareness of how at the trial level court and counsel proceed regarding objections of the sort here made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “failure to object to testimony when offered at trial results in the waiver of any right to present the matter on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.