574 So. 2d 625 - Jaco v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
74 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably 650 So. 2d 1289 - MacK v. State (1994), Taylor v. State (1996)
74 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · Gideon v. Wainwright · Murray v. Carrier · United States v. Marion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has no duty to bring himself to trial.... Still he gains far more points under this prong of the Barker test where he has demanded a speedy trial.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“The weight given each necessarily turns on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case, the quality of evidence available on each factor and, in the absence of evidence, identification of the party with the risk of non-persuasion. No one factor is dispositive.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brewer v. State · Bingham v. State“Inordinate delay, wholly aside from possible prejudice to a defense on the merits, may "seriously interfere with the defendant's liberty, whether he is free on bail or not, and ... may disrupt his employment, drain his financial resources, curtail his associations, subject him to public obloquy, and create anxiety, in him, his family and his friends." United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 320 [, 92 S.Ct. 455, 463 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 ] (1971). These factors are more serious for some than for others, but they are inevitably present in every case to some extent....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.