574 So. 2d 63 - Mills v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State (2004), Mills v. Singletary (1995)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Penry v. Lynaugh · Maynard v. Cartwright · Walton v. Arizona · Booth v. Maryland · Hitchcock v. Dugger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]abeas corpus is not to be used `for obtaining additional appeals of issues which were raised, or should have been raised, on direct appeal or which were waived at trial or which could have ... or have been, raised in' prior postconviction filings.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.