Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 So. 2d 910 - Robinson v. State

574 So. 2d 910 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · United States v. Mendenhall · California v. Beheler · Frye v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'When a defendant makes an equivocal request for an attorney during a custodial interrogation,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]bjections must be stated with `sufficient particularity' to apprise the trial court of `basis for the objection' so as to permit the trial court to make an informed decision `on the particular legal issue involved.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he statement of specific grounds of objection waives all grounds not specified, and the trial court will not be put in error on grounds not assigned at trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.