Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 SO2D 951 - Hamlet v. State

Hamlet v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Lawrence Metze v. New York · Walker v. Illinois · 494 So. 2d 124 - Magwood v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because all extra-judicial confessions are prima facie involuntary, the State has the burden of proving voluntariness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'known to the district attorney.' " 531 So.2d at 644 . The officer admitted that this offer to speak to the district attorney was an offer to " 'give something favorable to him if he would help.' " 531 So.2d at 644 . In Weeks , the Alabama Supreme Court held: "[W]here a suspect is subjected to custodial questioning regarding alleged criminal activity, such an express promise would necessarily engender a hope of favor in the suspect's mind. Because the statement was not voluntarily given, it should have been excluded from the consideration of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.