Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 SW2D 522 - Hontz v. State

Hontz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Clark v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · State v. Wagner · State v. Pierson · State v. Deshon · Eudaley v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The steady course of development of the law with respect to the disqualification of judge assigned to the case has continued along two courses: first, to make technical requirements for such applications less narrow and restrictive, and second, to include requirements with respect to timeliness and dispatch by providing for time limits within which such motions can be filed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Proceedings under Rule 27.26 are civil in nature, and the rule governing a change of judge is Rule 51.05 which in its terms is applicable to the court which imposed the sentence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.