Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 574 SW2D 97 - Lackey v. State

Lackey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Brasfield v. State (1980), Garcia v. Dial (1980)

26 state decisions

1501978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Cannon · Cross v. United States · King v. State · Casias v. State · 115 Ohio App. 219 - Wells v. Sacks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A person represented by legal counsel may in open court or by written instrument voluntarily waive the right to be accused by indictment of any offense other than a capital felony. On waiver as provided in this article, the accused shall be charged by information.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is well to bear in mind that a felony information acts in lieu or of as a substitute for an indictment and its validity is therefore essential to the court’s jurisdiction ... If an accused has not effectively waived his right to an indictment in full accordance with the statute the felony information is void. An indictment is still mandatory in absence of a valid waiver. For the waiver to be effective it must be intelligently, voluntarily, and knowingly given by the accused while represented by counsel... ****** To prevent the procedure permitted by Article 1.141, supra, from becoming a fertile breeding ground for future post-conviction habeas corpus applications, it would be better practice to have the written waiver executed in open court by the accused and his counsel, after the accused has been advised of his rights by the court.” (Footnote omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.