Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 F.2d 1051 - Salomon v. LaVallee

Salomon v. LaVallee’s Empirical Analysis

575 F.2d 1051 · 1978

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
April 1981
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Holloway v. Arkansas · Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez · Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist · United States v. DeBerry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Joint representation. — Whenever two or more defendants have been jointly charged pursuant to Rule 8(b) or have been joined for trial pursuant to Rule 13, and are represented by the same retained or assigned counsel or by retained or assigned counsel who are associated in the practice of law,.the court shall promptly inquire with respect to such joint representation and shall personally advise each defendant of his right to the effective assistance of counsel, including separate representation. Unless it appears that there is good cause to believe no conflict of interest is likely to arise, the court shall take such measures as may be appropriate to protect each defendant’s right to counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “some specific instance of prejudice, some real conflict of interest, resulting from a joint representation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.