Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 F.2d 1197 - Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Eckerd

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Eckerd’s Empirical Analysis

575 F.2d 1197 · 1978

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1980
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Cort v. Ash · Department of the Air Force v. Rose · J. I. Case Co. v. Borak · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(e) It shall be unlawful for any officer or employee of the Commission to make public in any manner whatever any information obtained by the Commission pursuant to its authority under this section prior to the institution of any proceeding under this subchapter involving such information. Any officer or employee of the Commission who shall make public in any manner whatever any information in violation of this subsection shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than one year.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “. . . regulations valid under 5 U.S.C. § 301 satisfy the "authorized by law" exception to Section 1905. Since validly promulgated regulations have the force of law . . . they satisfy the authorization requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 1905 . Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “. . . each time Congress wanted to except an item or class of items from Section 1905 it would have to do so by statute in a manner with sufficient specificity to avoid agency discretion. Id. at 1201.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.