Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 F.2d 26 - United States v. Gullion

United States v. Gullion’s Empirical Analysis

575 F.2d 26 · 1978

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Angiulo (1990), United States v. Drougas (1984)

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

31019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Murphy v. Florida · Rideau v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a change of venue may be granted if the court determines that there exists in the district 'so great a prejudice against the defendant that he cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'There are few aspects of a jury trial where we would be less inclined to disturb a trial judge's exercise of discretion, absent clear abuse, than in ruling on challenges for cause in the empanelling of a jury.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the [voir dire] ... examination satisfied the trial judge that the effects of the pretrial publicity were not prejudicial, there would be no necessity for his holding an evidentiary hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.