Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 F.2d 749 - De Peralta v. Garrison

De Peralta v. Garrison’s Empirical Analysis

575 F.2d 749 · 1978

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
March 1992
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1992 · most notably Watts v. Hadden (1981), Rifai v. United States Parole Commission (1978)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

150197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dorszynski v. United States · White v. Warden, United States Penitentiary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) If an eligible prisoner has substantially observed the rules of the institution or institutions to which he has been confined, and if the Commission, upon consideration of the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the prisoner, determines: (1) that release would not depreciate the seriousness of his offense or promote disrespect for the law; and (2) that release would not jeopardize the public welfare; subject to the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of this section, and pursuant to guidelines promulgated by the Corn-mission pursuant to section 4203(a)(1), such prisoner shall be released.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Parole Commission to the extent it did do so, should not have relied upon the 1976 Act or the Regulations implemented pursuant thereto in denying DePeralta release on parole. Rather, the Commission could and should have upheld the law in force at the time DePeralta was sentenced in determining whether parole release for DePeralta was appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.