Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 F.2d 882 - John Arthur Wager v. Maynard J. Pro

John Arthur Wager v. Maynard J. Pro’s Empirical Analysis

575 F.2d 882 · 1976

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2019

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

8019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sherman v. United States · Rosen v. United States · Grimm v. United States · Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. Coyer · Daniels v. Tearney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “even if the trial court is convinced that the party opposing the motion is unlikely to prevail at trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “issues of fact which if proved would defeat recovery,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all reasonable inferences to the opponent's pleadings”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.