Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 F.3d 1069 - United States v. Collins

United States v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

575 F.3d 1069 · 2009

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2024

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Jones · United States v. Jarvis · United States v. Lauder · United States v. Smith · United States v. Chavez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because hearsay determinations are particularly fact and case specific, our review of those decisions is especially deferential. Further, this court applies a harmless error standard when reviewing trial courts’ rulings on hearsay objections resting solely on the Federal Rules of Evidence. A harmless error is one that does not have a substantial influence on the outcome of the trial; nor does it leave one in grave doubt as to whether it had such effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]nvoking the word 'context' does not permit an end-run around the hearsay rules such that the government may smuggle into evidence all interviewer statements. We view such evidence with a particularly jaundiced eye when, as here, the officers' statements regularly overwhelm the defendant's.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]ut we need not decide whether it was error to admit the entire recording because we conclude that if it was error, the error was harmless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.