Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 FSUPP 1207 - First Amendment Foundation v. Village of Brookfield

First Amendment Foundation v. Village of Brookfield’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2011

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1654

Relies on 407 F. Supp. 451 - Turner v. American Bar Ass'n · Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar Association · Strong Delivery Ministry Association, an Illinois Corporation v. Board of Appeals of Cook County and Mr. George Dunne, President of Cook County Board of Commissioners, Sears, Sucsy & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Insurance Company of North America, Third-Party v. Westcott Trainor, Third-Party · United States v. Reeves · 555 F. Supp. 684 - Move Organization v. United States Department of Justice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Corporations must be represented in court by attorneys admitted to practice, and may not appear through an officer or other lay representative. Strong Delivery Ministry Association v. Board of Appeals, 543 F.2d 32 (7th Cir.1976). The same rule applies to partnerships and other unincorporated organizations. Move Organization v. United States Department of Justice, 555 F.Supp. 684, 692-93 (E.D.Pa.1983); Tur ner v. American Bar Association, 407 F.Supp. 451, 476 (N.D.Tex., W.D.Pa., N.D.Ind., D.Minn., S.D.Ala., W.D.Wis.1975), aff'd sub nom. Pilla v. American Bar Association, 542 F.2d 56 (8th Cir.1976). But see United States v. Reeves, 431 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir.1970).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.