Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 NE2D 981 - Brady v. State

Brady v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
8
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Smylie v. State (2005), Lannan v. State (1992)

2 federal appellate · 72 state decisions

4701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Mattox v. United States · Miller v. State · Commonwealth v. Willis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right ... to meet the witnesses face to face....”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The nature of the relationship between the witness and the accused, the highly embarrassing character of the testimony and the courtroom setting itself combine to create a stressful, traumatic environment likely to make a child a reluctant, unreliable witness ... [Thirty-four states have recognized that] some measure must be taken to provide additional protection for child witnesses and ... these safeguards can be created without endangering the constitutional rights of an accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Trial testimony, although naturally somewhat stressful, is not intended to be an ordeal for the witness. Rather, it is designed to be an engine for seeking and attaining truth. The revelation of an untruthful witness is properly the result of skillful cross-examination and not of a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.