In Re Robson’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2011
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM · Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Walker · Brownell v. Stjepan Bozo Carija · Thomas v. Einbinder · Amos Treat & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the contention of respondent that these services were performed in his capacity as a licensed real estate broker, notary public, abstracter, and loan agent. It is not necessary for us to determine in this case if and under what circumstances others might perform such services, although not admitted to the bar.... A suspended lawyer will not be heard to say that services recognized as within the practice of law were performed in some other capacity when he is called to account.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There is ... no merit to the claim that the combination of functions of the state bar attorney, alleged to be that of complainant, prosecutor and adjudicator, violated due process or AS 44.62.630. The combination of investigative and judicial functions within an agency does not violate due process; a board may make preliminary factual inquiry on its own in order to determine if charges should be filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]n impartial tribunal is basic to a guarantee of due process. . . . When an administrative official has participated in the past in any advocacy capacity against the party in question, fundamental fairness is normally held to require that the former advocate take no part in rendering the decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Nash
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.