575 So. 2d 1 - Berry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State (1991), 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State (1995)
1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Beck v. Alabama · Jurek v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]espite these disturbing facts, the trial court cannot retry all prior convictions; thus, we have held the trial judge is not required to look beyond the prior conviction, valid on its face.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State · Jackson v. State“No reasonable hypothetical juror could find that this killing was without malice”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Denial of a challenge for cause is not error where it is not shown that the defense has exhausted peremptory challenges and is thus forced to accept the juror. Rush v. State, 278 So.2d 456, 458 (Miss.1973). This threshold test is applicable in a capital murder case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.