Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 SO2D 1379 - Butts v. State

Butts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spivey v. State · 543 So. 2d 411 - State v. Prusinsky · 556 So. 2d 782 - Dickens v. State · Leyba v. State · 491 So. 2d 326 - Morgan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Restitution. — (6) The court, in determining whether to order restitution and the amount of such restitution, shall consider the amount of the loss sustained by any victim as a result of the offense, the financial resources of the defendant, the present and potential future financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and his dependents, and such other facts which it deems appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In short, a defendant must affirmatively assert his rights under section 775.089(6) [now subsection (7)], when he is given the opportunity to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.