Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

575 So. 2d 288

Docket No. 90-1658.

Davis v. State

Nathaniel DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1991.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-02-26

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2002

6 state decisions

Relies on 434 So. 2d 366 - Nunes v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-02-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

¶2*289 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Monique T. Befeler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

¶3Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The State confesses error with respect to the defendant's contention that the trial court failed to inform defendant of the accusation of criminal contempt and failed to afford him an opportunity to present mitigating or excusing evidence. The record reflects merely that proceedings were held wherein the trial court questioned the defendant regarding his nonappearance at trial three days earlier and defendant made a brief statement by way of explanation. The court adjudicated defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and pronounced sentence, over defense counsel's objection that defendant was entitled to a hearing. This did not constitute sufficient notice and opportunity to present evidence. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830; see Nunes v. State,434 So.2d 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

¶6Reversed and remanded.

/575/so2d/288 · .json · Public domain