575 So. 2d 808 - Fredricks v. Fredricks’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 333 So. 2d 17 - Kern v. Kern · 536 So. 2d 358 - Clayman v. Clayman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel for the parties should be given an opportunity to review the reports for purposes of introducing any evidence that might rebut the conclusions or recommendations which the reports contained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crifaci v. Crifaci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.