575 So. 2d 848 - State v. Munoz’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 759 So. 2d 961 - State v. Wickem (2000), State v. Stec (1999)
1 federal appellate · 72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 398 So. 2d 1049 - State v. Jones · 416 So. 2d 528 - State v. Ratcliff · 443 So. 2d 522 - State v. Sweeney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Dangerous weapon" includes any gas, liquid or other substance or instrumentality, which, in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Michels · State v. Cotton“the dangerousness of the instrumentality because of its use is a factual question for the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Michels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.