Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 575 S.W.2d 21 - Floyd v. State

Floyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Engelking v. State (1988), Ex Parte Anderson (1995)

2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

19019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. Levy · Ex Parte Granviel · Powell v. State · Courtemanche v. State · Farmer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both common logic and the rules of grammar dictate that a prostitution enterprise that uses prostitutes necessarily uses them for prostitution.... The terms complained of by appellant do not render Section 43.04 so ambiguous and vague that men of ordinary intelligence would guess at its meaning or differ as to its application.... Appellant had sufficient notice of the type of conduct proscribed by the statute and therefore he was not deprived of procedural due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Russell v. State
  2. “A person commits an offense if he knowingly owns, invests in, finances, controls, supervises, or manages a prostitution enterprise that uses two or more prostitutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Russell v. State
  3. “measured by common understanding and practices,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Robinson v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.