Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 F.2d 787 - United States v. Fried

United States v. Fried’s Empirical Analysis

576 F.2d 787 · 1978

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably United States v. Fleishman (1982), United States v. Provenzano (1980)

50 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

4201978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Costello v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “while we insist that probable cause be shown, we give great deference to the decision of the magistrate who concludes that such a showing has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “giving the language a common sense and realistic interpretation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.