Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 F.3d 890 - Tian v. Holder

Tian v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

576 F.3d 890 · 2009

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Nijhawan v. Holder · FRENTESCU · Afridi v. Gonzales · N-A-M

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the nature of the conviction, the circumstances and underlying facts of the conviction, the type of sentence imposed, and most importantly whether the type and circumstances of the crime indicate that the alien will be a danger to the community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the Attorney General decides that ... the alien, having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime is a danger to the community of the United States[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the BIA has generally examined a variety of factors and found that the consideration of the individual facts and circumstances [of the conviction] is appropriate”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.