Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 F.3d 95 - Doe v. Central Intelligence Agency

Doe v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis

576 F.3d 95 · 2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2021

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

30200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Franks v. Delaware · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Waller v. Georgia · United States v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reynolds makes clear that “classified” cannot be equated with “secret” within the meaning of the doctrine. If the simple fact that information is classified were enough to bring evidence containing that information within the scope of the privilege, then the entire state secrets inquiry — from determining which matters are secret to which disclosures pose a threat to national security— would fall exclusively to the Executive Branch, in plain contravention of the Supreme Court’s admonition that “judicial control over the evidence in a case cannot be abdicated to the caprice of executive officers” without “lead[ing] to intolerable abuses.” 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “de novo” review of an agency's decision to withhold records under one of the statute's exemptions, including the exemption for properly classified information, see 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(4)(B). Likewise, when reviewing the government’s invocation of the state-secrets privilege,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.