576 F. Supp. 2d 113 - Aliotta v. Bair’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 8 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the new positions were for workers assuming different responsibilities for lower pay in different departments than the plaintiffs. Clearly, the two groups are not so similarly situated as to support the proposition that the FDIC conducted the voluntary buyout, transfers and RIF as an elaborate ruse to flush the agency of senior staff.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 623 F. Supp. 2d 73 - Aliotta v. Bair

2. “[m]embers of the D.C. District Court remain divided on the issue” of whether a plaintiff may allege disparate impact under the ADEA against federal employers). For the same reason, we need not resolve whether the “business necessity” test for rebutting a disparate impact claim under Title VII or the less strict”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Aliotta v. Bair

3. “a specific adverse employment practice within the 2005 downsizing”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Davis v. Dist. of Columbia