Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 F. Supp. 2d 732 - Lewis v. Waletzky

576 F. Supp. 2d 732 - Lewis v. Waletzky’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2010
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Hanna v. Plumer · Ida Maxwell Wells v. G. Gordon Liddy, Phillip MacKin Bailley, Movant · Oxtoby v. McGowan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the Act has been amended to allow a plaintiff to unilaterally waive the Act’s arbitration requirement, the Act still requires a potential plaintiff to file her claim and a certificate of qualified expert with HCADRO and to follow specific procedures for waiver of arbitration prior to filing her claim in state or federal court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.