Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 NW2D 369 - State v. King

State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2018

8 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · State v. Kuchenreuther · State v. Edwards · State v. Hinners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the prosecutor's promise to remain silent at sentencing, a commonly bargained-for component of a plea agreement, was ignored”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “tainted the entire sentencing proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.