Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 576 N.W.2d 634 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Old Chief v. United States · Goldstein v. United States · State v. Plaster · State v. Trudo · State v. Hubka

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Multiple offenses arise out of the same transaction or occurrence “where the facts of each charge can be explained adequately only by drawing upon the facts of the other charge.” If either crime can be proven without reference to the other, this test is not met and severance is required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.